Sunday, June 18, 2006

A note on pictures

I do have pictures for both of the last two posts, but Blogger is having some issues right now, so I'll come back and upload them as soon as I can. (Cause you can't have a good post without a picture.

Tea and Tolkien with Tim Keller

I just came back last night from one of the most interesting and creative events I’ve ever seen a church put on. It was stimulating, fascinating, and honestly just a lot of fun.
Tim Keller is the senior pastor at Redeemer Presbyterian, the church I attend here in New York. (I’m not sure if ‘senior pastor’ is his title or not, but he’s the lead pastor, and the one who does most of the preaching Sunday to Sunday. He’s also the founder of the church.) The church put on an evening for members to sign up for that, as the title suggests, they could join Tim for tea and discuss Tolkien’s works. We found out that Tim is a HUGE fan to Tolkien’s; he preempted the obvious ‘how many times have you read them’ question by saying that honestly since he first picked them up in college he has never stopped reading them. He reads them cyclically, along with all of the other work available on Middle Earth, such as the Silmarillion and the multi-volume encyclopedia of footnotes and unfinished material that Tolkien’s son published.
Hearing an analysis of the work from a seasoned and brilliant reader who is a pastor no less, was just outstanding, and I gained a couple of interesting insights during the evening (in addition to thoroughly enjoying myself)
-) Tim said that the primary influence in terms of Tolkien and CS Lewis, who were friends & contemporaries, and a part of a literary circle at Oxford known as the Inklings, went from Tolkien to Lewis. That is, Tolkien and his material had a far greater influence on Lewis than the other way around. It is worth noting however that while Lewis loved LOTR, praised Tolkien lavishly for it and during his readings, encouraging him to continue writing it, Tolkien basically hated the Narnia books (from a literary standpoint). Tolkien strongly disliked allegory, so the Aslan-as-Jesus character was a bit too much for him; it offended his sensibilities because it was so obvious. (Lewis rebutted this by saying they were children’s stories and the overt symbolism would go over their heads, which is pretty thin argument. My mother read all of the Chronicles to me when I was young, and it was VERY obvious to me who Aslan was.) He also felt that Lewis’ Narnia wasn’t consistently put together, that he borrowed to liberally from too many different mythological traditions. If you look at LOTR, most of the myths he draws from are very old Northern European traditions, things like Beowulf. But with Narnia, which has elves and dragons and fauns and centaurs and almost everything else, Lewis felt it turned into somewhat of a menagerie and became rather silly.
-) I had the chance to ask Tim a question, and I asked him who the character or characters were he most closely identified with. He said he couldn’t really answer that directly, but he did give some interesting commentary on some of the characters and on the races, particularly the dwarves, who he said he often feels like on his poorer days as the dwarves often fall victim to being too much in love with the work of their own hands. But he did say that, commenting on the movies, he’d liked them very much, and although there were some characters not as well done as the book, a few he felt the movie helped him understand even more or better. One of these was Sean Bean playing Boromir, and as soon as he said it I knew what he meant. Bean nailed Boromir’s very nuanced character so precisely that I have a hard time now not picturing his face when I think of the character.
-) But the most interesting insight Tim gave was this: he explained, in a way that no one else ever has been able to, what the ring of power actually is, what it represents. He spent a lot of time discussing & analyzing the themes & symbols in the story, so it was inevitable we should come to the ring. “The ring,” he said “In reality, is an idol magnifier. It draws out and amplifies the idolatrous desires in each character’s heart. That’s why Sam sees himself as the ultimate gardener, and Gollum dreams of eating fresh fish every day, and Galadriel would become dark and terrible in her beauty.” But ultimately the ring corrupts both the desire itself as well as the person wielding it. It is the tool that allows for the actualization of that very dangerous wish, to have what it is one most wants above and beyond all laws or limits. Above what is legal, beyond was it moral, outside the scope of what is good and right and holy. I’ve never heard such a good answer to the question of what the ring actually symbolizes.
-) One other thing that’s very interesting, and this speaks to both the power of the work and to the subtle Christian themes that are woven into the fabric of the tale through and through. Tim said he started reading them for the first time in college, when he was still a young Christian. At that time, he said, he was still very immature, still wrestling with a lot of sin and foolishness, but he said that whenever he would read Tolkien, he came away from it with a desire “to be holy”. The books inspired him to try and do better, to be a nobler, better man, that they stirred his heart and gave him the courage to believe, and to try again. I was glad to hear him say this; I know that there are a couple of works that when I read them, I feel much the same way.
One of the things that made this event so extraordinary is that Tim is a well-known pastor of a large urban church. As such, he is responsible for the preaching, and for leading the church, but due to practicality and logistics, he is not able to spend much time with his congregation in a more direct, personal way. I don’t fault him for this at all, I understand there is only so much of any one man to go around. However, I do think there is a danger in pastors becoming so popular that they remove themselves entirely from their congregations; that they never do more informal events where they take time to greet people, shake hands, chat, etc. This event was the perfect counterbalance. I was deeply struck by the level of Tim’s service to his people. I arrived at the church offices a few minutes early, and as I watched, it was Tim himself who made the tea, set out the cookie trays, got everything ready for the people coming, really served them. He didn’t do the event as a ‘preaching lite’, didn’t wait in the background for everyone else to do the work, show up and give his talk, and then disappear afterwards. He was involved in the whole thing with his own hands, start to finish, and he stayed for a while afterwards just to shake hands, meet people, chat with them, really interact. It was one of the most beautiful things I’ve ever seen, and as I said, it was I felt the perfect balance against the normal duties of his job. All in all, a great evening.

Saturday, June 17, 2006

#42

A few days ago, I had another opportunity to hear someone speak that I’ve been curious to hear for a long time: Former President Clinton. And I must say, I was very, very impressed.
Mr. Clinton has his offices just up the street in Harlem, and came to the school to speak during a large gathering promoting public service. Hillary was also here, speaking on a different day, and so was Mayor Bloomberg, but I didn’t get a chance to hear either of them speak.
Bill Clinton is probably the most naturally gifted speaker I’ve ever heard. He strikes the perfect balance between many different aspects of public speaking that are, admittedly, hard to balance. He sounds very smart when he speaks, that he is cultured and knowledgeable about relevant issues, but he never sounds condescending. He’s able to be immediate, to connect with his audience and use language that doesn’t sound snobbish, but he doesn’t do ‘folksy’, the way Bush does. He tells jokes, but he doesn’t deviate too far off topic. And perhaps most impressively of all, he maintains excellent eye contact with his audience. You feel as if you are in a room with him and only a few others, and that you have his full attention. He very rarely looks down at notes, which gives the strong impression that he’s speaking naturally, that he isn’t just reading a prepared speech. I’d always sensed that this would make a huge difference in public speaking, and does it ever.
I came away very impressed by him, and I also realized I think that I have judged him too harshly. People seem (to me) to fall into two camps related to his affair with Lewinsky: those who say it didn’t matter at all, and those who feel it was the only thing that mattered about his presidency. Neither of these are accurate. I myself tended to fall on the later end of the spectrum, and I still do feel a leader is called to set an example, and he set a very poor one in many ways related to that. But he did strike me as someone who does care deeply about this country, about the world, and still very much wants to do some good. I’ve also been inclined not to give credit where it is due related to some of his good policy decisions while in office. So all in all, it truly was a great learning experience.

Dark Side of the Moon

Has everyone out there listened to this album? I mean … seriously!
They say that college is a time to experiment, try new things, blah blah blah, and one thing that students often branch out on is music. I’m in a bit of a different spot as I’m older and have a better feel for my musical tastes, but I still like listening to new things. I don’t remember exactly what got me thinking about it, but I kept hearing about how great Pink Floyd was, and how DSOTM was their definitive album. So, I had a friend hook me up with it, and I gave it a listen this last week.
And it is amazing! I can see now what everyone likes about it so well, it’s just a great, great album. The sounds are very unique, the pacing of the album is fantastic, in that it isn’t in a hurry to get somewhere, and the themes and the way that they’re relayed are just very, very creative.
It’s impressive that more than 30 years after the album was first released that it still continues to be so popular. For anyone who hasn’t heard it yet, I highly, HIGHLY recommend it.

Game Theory

I’m taking two classes this fall, Econometrics, and Game Theory. Econometrics is basically applied statistics with respect to economic problems; it’s mostly very boring and our professor is not the best lecturer I’ve ever had. Frankly, I’ll be pleased once the course is over.
Game Theory though has proved a bit more interesting. One of the cool things that we learned about is what a Nash Equilibrium is, named after John Forbes Nash, the guy from Ron Howard’s ‘A Beautiful Mind’. And interestingly (but not surprisingly) the movie portrayed the idea incorrectly.
Here’s the basic premise. Suppose you’re playing a two player game. A Nash Equilibrium (NE) is a strategy for each player, and an outcome of that strategy, such that neither player could play a different strategy and do better, as long as his opponent played the same strategy. It would be a bit easier to explain on paper, but in simple terms all it says is that a game will calm down and everyone will be ‘content’, more or less, once all the individual opportunities for advancement have disappeared.
Simple enough, right? It’s actually a very powerful concept. The distressing thing is that the example the movie used is not a NE. The prettiest girl comes into the bar. She’ll refuse everyone if they approach her at once, and then none of the guys can get another girl, because nobody wants to be chosen second. So, they all have to ignore the pretty girl, so that they can all get a girl. However, the prettiest girl is still available, and under the premise that everyone would like to dance with her, somebody will, in effect, “cheat” and go ask her to dance. As long as she doesn’t have a partner, all the other guys are basically tempted to try and ‘do better’ by asking her.
It would have been easy to come up with a better example, and it’s irritating that Hollywood once again can’t seem to get certain technical details correct. But at least my class is interesting …

Central Park

I had the opportunity to go down to Central Park for the first time since being here a few weeks ago for a church picnic. It was a really good time, the park itself is quite beautiful. It’s very interesting because once you’re in the park, everything around you is lush and green, trees and rolling hills. The only thing to remind you that you’re not in fact in the countryside are the skyscrapers that can still be seen above the tops of the trees.
It was a great afternoon, and I got to meet some good people, but the one downside was somehow, I forgot my camera. Which really sucks, because it was a beautiful day and would have made for some great pictures. This one was taken by someone else there; it’s kind of a fun action shot, but it’s not as good as some of the others I could have taken with my own camera. The next time I’m down there, I’ll make an effort to remember to bring it.

Internship

Started my internship with the Weatherhead Institute a few weeks ago, and so far it’s been pretty good. The Weatherhead East Asian Institute (WEAI) is the East Asian studies department here at Columbia. Much of the institute’s work is research at the graduate level, but they’re trying to promote awareness and cross-cultural learning on a number of different levels. Part of the reason I was recruited is to help serve as a liaison to my school, General Studies, and to help promote their offerings at the undergraduate level.
( A quick aside, Columbia University has four distinct undergraduate ‘schools’ under its umbrella, along with a number of graduate schools. The four are Columbia College, Barnard, the girls college which was started back with CC only accepted males, SEAS, which is the school of engineering, and GS, which is the school for ‘non-traditional’ or returning students. )
Anyways, the particular part of WEAI that I’m a part of is called ExEAS, for Expanding East Asian Studies. They put together these great course curriculums for use in other courses to teach people about different aspects of Asian cultures. So far I’ve been helping compile some usage reports from their website on which modules are being used the most.
Originally I thought I had a summer internship with Merrill Lynch lined up, but at the last minute it fell through. This one presented itself fairly unexpectedly, but it’s been very convenient, being located right here on campus, and it pays a little bit of money, which is quite helpful. It should also be a good reference when I’m interested in traveling to China to do business. Given a couple years of college language and the experience here, should be good.

I’ve included the main WEAI website, as well as the one for ExEAS. Go take a look at the undergraduate interns page on either one …
www.columbia.edu/cu/weai/
www.exeas.org/